Skip to main content
Novel Technologies
AI, Data & Engineering

Data, AI & Analytics

AI projects fail on data quality far more often than on model choice. We start by making the data trustworthy — pipelines that are tested, lineage that is traceable, definitions that are agreed — and then build analytics and AI on top of a foundation that will hold.

Start a conversationFor enterprises
Starting point
Data quality, always
Evaluation
Built before the feature
Governance
Lineage and access by default
Deployment
Production, not pilot
What's included

What this engagement covers

  • Data platform engineering

    Warehouses and lakehouses with tested transformations, documented models and lineage — built so an analyst can trust a number without tracing it by hand.

  • Pipeline development

    Batch and streaming ingestion with data quality tests, schema-change handling and alerting that fires before the dashboard is wrong.

  • Business intelligence

    Semantic layers and dashboards built on agreed definitions, so two teams asking the same question get the same answer.

  • Machine learning in production

    Forecasting, classification, recommendation and anomaly detection — deployed with monitoring, retraining and drift detection rather than left in a notebook.

  • Generative AI systems

    Retrieval-augmented assistants, document processing and content workflows, each with an evaluation harness and a defined human review path.

  • Data governance

    Catalogues, lineage, access control, retention and privacy controls that satisfy audit without making the data unusable.

Process

How we approach data work

Written down so you can hold us to it.

  1. Data and use-case assessment

    What data exists, what condition it is in, and which questions the business actually needs answered. Frequently the highest-value finding is that a proposed AI use case needs data you do not yet collect.

  2. Foundations first

    Ingestion, modelling and quality testing for the domains in scope. Unglamorous, and the single largest determinant of whether everything downstream works.

  3. Analytics layer

    A semantic layer with agreed definitions, then dashboards and self-service access built on it rather than on ad-hoc queries.

  4. Models and AI features

    Baseline first — often a simple model or a rule — then increase sophistication only where it measurably beats the baseline.

  5. Productionise and monitor

    Deployment with drift detection, quality monitoring, cost tracking and retraining paths, plus a defined human escalation route for AI-assisted decisions.

Outcomes

What you get

  • A tested, documented data platform with traceable lineage
  • Agreed metric definitions in a semantic layer, not scattered across reports
  • Data quality monitored with alerting ahead of consumers
  • Models deployed with monitoring, drift detection and retraining paths
  • AI features with evaluation suites that run on every change
  • Governance that satisfies audit without blocking legitimate access
Detail

Platforms and tooling

Platforms

  • Snowflake
  • Databricks
  • BigQuery
  • Redshift
  • Microsoft Fabric
  • PostgreSQL

Pipelines

  • dbt
  • Airflow
  • Dagster
  • Kafka
  • Spark
  • Change data capture
  • Great Expectations

Analytics

  • Power BI
  • Tableau
  • Looker
  • Semantic layers
  • Metric stores

ML & AI

  • Python
  • scikit-learn
  • PyTorch
  • MLflow
  • Vector databases
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Model evaluation
Questions

What people ask about this service

Including the ones with answers you might not want.

We want to start with an AI feature. Do we really need a data platform first?
Not always a full platform — but you do need the specific data the feature depends on to be reliable, accessible and understood. We scope the minimum foundation the use case actually requires rather than defaulting to a two-year platform programme. Sometimes that minimum is genuinely small.
How do you decide between classical ML and generative AI?
By the shape of the problem. Structured prediction on tabular data — churn, demand, fraud, pricing — is usually better served by gradient boosting: cheaper, faster, more accurate and far easier to explain. Generative models earn their place on unstructured language and content tasks. Choosing by problem rather than by trend is most of the value here.
How do you handle AI accuracy and hallucination?
With evaluation suites built before the feature ships, retrieval grounding with citation back to source, confidence thresholds that route uncertain cases to a human, and monitoring in production. We also refuse use cases where the error cost is high and no human review step is acceptable — that is a design constraint, not a technology gap.
Can you work with our existing warehouse?
Yes. Most engagements build on what is already there. Recommending a platform migration is a serious call and we make it only when the current platform genuinely cannot meet the requirement, not as a matter of preference.

Still unresolved? Ask us directly.

Related
  • For individuals

    AI & GenAI Training

    Applied training in machine learning and generative AI engineering — building and evaluating real systems, not prompt tips.

    Service detail
  • For enterprises

    Cloud & Infrastructure

    Cloud migration, platform engineering and cost optimisation — infrastructure that is reproducible, observable and affordable.

    Service detail
  • For enterprises

    Enterprise Software Development

    Custom platforms and applications built to be maintained — tested, documented and handed over to your team.

    Service detail
Next step

Talk about your data

Whether you are starting a platform or trying to get an AI pilot into production, we will give you a realistic read.